The Christian Association of Nigeria has called on the Senate to reject the nomination of Lauretta Onochie as a national commissioner of the Independent National Electoral Commission.
The body described her nomination as executive recklessness
CAN in statement made available to Church Times signed by its president, Dr. Olasupo Ayokunle described Onochie’s nomination as “executive recklessness, a dirty slap on the populace, and a gross violation of the 1999 Constitution (as Amended).”
The body stated that the nomination of the president’s personal aide to such a sensitive position may have revealed the type of electoral legacy the President is working on.
It then called on the Senate to reject the nomination of Lauretta Onochie as a member of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
Quoting Section 156 (1) (a) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) Act No 1, 2010, the CAN stated, “a member of the INEC “shall not be a member of a political party.” Whereas Onochie is reportedly said to be a card-carrying member of the ruling party. That disqualifies her from being nominated and appointed to serve in INEC.
CAN stated further that the “President has power to appoint members of INEC whenever there are vacancies. He is expected to abide by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in doing so. He is required to consult with the Council of State as stated in section 154 (3) of the Constitution and we have no record that this had been done before forwarding Onochie’s name to the Senate.”
The body insists that president has erred if it has not consulted the council of state before forwarding Onochie’s name to the Senate as demanded by Section 154 (1) of the Constitution which says the appointment of the members of the Independent National Electoral Commission shall be subject to confirmation by the Senate.
The statement notes further, “As far as CAN is concerned, Onochie suffers objectivity, justice and fairness that are mandatory for every member of INEC as a result of her partisan membership of a political party and by being an appointee of the ruling party.
“We are equally opposed to her nomination because of her unguarded remarks, public insults on credible individuals and the use of vulgar language and unprintable words against people who express their displeasure to some actions and policies of the government of the day, especially, her principal.
“Our Association and her leadership had been a victim of her unguarded statements since her appointment as the Special Assistant to the President on Social Media. A person like her by her utterances does not have the character to occupy a position of unbiased umpire in national elections in Nigeria’
CAN also on the Senate to do a thorough investigation of other three nominees to ensure that they are truly qualified and competent for the appointment and that they do not belong to any political party. This would prevent unnecessary interference in the conduct of elections and ensure conduct of credible elections for our general good.
“It is shameful, disappointing, disheartening, unacceptable that our elections in recent years have been far from being free, fair and credible. This may not be far from the partiality of the election umpires, among others.
“We appeal to the Senate to save the nation from constitutional breach and crises during elections that can consume the nation.”
